OpinionNovember 17, 2015

The Washington state Supreme Court and the voters in the Evergreen State have ordered Washington's public schools through court rulings and a voter initiative to reduce the number of students in each of the state's classrooms.

The problem is smaller class sizes don't come without a substantial cost and the judges and voters haven't given school officials any idea on how they are supposed to pay the bill for additional teachers and infrastructure. Voters have even handcuffed legislators by approving initiatives that make it nearly impossible to raise taxes statewide and shooting down another that would have established an income tax for the state's richest residents, the ones who can afford to pay a little more so the state's children can have those smaller classroom sizes.

School districts are left with unattractive options, which is where officials in Pullman currently find themselves.

Daily headlines, straight to your inboxRead it online first and stay up-to-date, delivered daily at 7 AM

PSD Superintendent Paul Sturm said enrollment throughout the district has increased by roughly about 300 students during the past two years. Not only does the district have to contend with a growing student body, it also is being forced to implement all-day kindergarten next year and reduce class sizes starting during the 2017-18 school year.

So, this week the school board will vote on whether to ask voters in February to approve a $23 million bond - on top of renewing the district's $5.3 million maintenance and operations levy - to pay for a fourth elementary school in the district. This comes on the heels a six-room addition to Jefferson Elementary School in 2014 and extensive renovations and additions to Pullman's high school, the latter of which is being funded by a $53.5 million bond that voters passed in February 2013.

There are few people who would argue that children don't fare better in smaller classrooms and with closer instruction from teachers, but school districts can only ask their local taxpayer base for so much.

That income tax to the top 1 percent is sure looking like a good idea right about now.

Daily headlines, straight to your inboxRead it online first and stay up-to-date, delivered daily at 7 AM